The
Ferrari balance sheet used to be the same colour as the cars – red.
Over-production and imperfect technology took its toll until Luca di Montezemolo
became president...No more red
Timeline:12 December 1999 As Luca di Montezemolo strides to his
office from some sort of crisis meeting deep in the bowels of the modern Ferrari
car-making complex, his visitors learn there is a problem with his new racing
car. Not that he tells them. It is serious enough for 52-year-old di Montezemolo
to have got very angry with his people. The aftermath of the anger flows into
the interview, as he berates his aides again for not telling him about the
photograph session that is scheduled to follow. Despite the fact
that everything is going extremely well at Ferrari, there is a new anger about
di Montezemolo in 2000.
Never a man
to suffer fools gladly he has vowed not to suffer them at all in the fist year
of the new millennium. He is a man on a mission this year. He has the Ferrari
car factory working like a sewing machine, manufacturing the best sports cars
ever and making plenty of money. Yet he is lavishing a record near quarter of a
billion dollars on his racing team and not, so far, achieving the results he
wants. Sure they won the constructors championship in 1999 but the fact remains
that for the past four years in succession, Ferrari has been second best in the
Formula One world championship. For a man like di Montezemolo, finishing second
four years running is devastating – it visibly pains and grieves him. He cannot
believe his team has played second fiddle four times – for him second may as
well be nowhere.
It’s certainly a far
cry from the years between 1975 and 1978, when he was in direct charge of the
team and he won three times and finished second twice. It is why in
September last year he finally snapped and read the riot act to number one
driver Michael Schumacher. Schumacher, supposedly still recovering from a broken
leg but in reality in his garden playing football, was told by di Montezemolo to
turn up for work and earn his salary. It was a pivotal
moment for di Montezemolo but he realised he had nothing to lose. Schumacher
could have thrown a tantrum, put the phone down and refused to listen. And then
maybe walked out of his contract on some pretext and driven for deadly rival
Mercedes in 2000. But Ferrari was second anyway. Would it be the end of the
world if he did? For the first time di Montezemolo thought it wouldn’t and from
that moment on he took the gloves off and told the team to earn their salaries.
Before that moment di Montezemolo had given the highly paid management of the
Ferrari racing team the benefit of the doubt and time to win. Now they all know
that if they don’t win in 2000 there will be changes. This fresh approach means
that new second driver Rubens Barrichello won’t
play second fiddle to Schumacher in 2000 either. If he is faster then he will be
allowed to win. At 52 di Montezemolo
seems wedded to Ferrari for the rest of his career, unless he is finally called
up for a weightier role at Fiat. But as he gets older it becomes more obvious
that he will not succeed Agnelli at the head of the Fiat empire and that a
generation will be skipped and younger Agnelli nephews will succeed. Despite that di
Montezemolo is determined to finish his career in a blaze of glory. He is
Italian, he is passionate – and he wants to win. His whole reputation is on the
line. If Gianni Agnelli is king of Italy (and many think he is), then Luca di
Montezemolo is his crown prince. For him the remaining jobs are recreating the
Ferrari-owned Maserati as a major sports car maker and making Ferrari the
undisputed world champion of Formula One. Few Europeans
realise how famous and revered di Montezemolo is inside Italy. He is in fact the
country’s most famous entrepreneur – Italy’s equivalent to Britain’s Richard
Branson and France’s François Pinault. His career started
at Ferrari in the early seventies when he ran the sporting division, which
included the F1 team and sports car racing. Then he was an unqualified success.
He was marked out and began a 20-year journey through the Agnelli empire. But
for some reason the early promise failed to materialise and he never really
shined again, although he was very high profile and regarded as one of Italy’s
best businessmen. Then almost as a
swansong di Montezemolo returned in 1991 to head up Ferrari after Enzo Ferrari’s
death. On his return, after a 20-year absence, he found the factory in a mess.
Despite being half-owned by Fiat, Enzo Ferrari had retained absolute autonomy.
Such was his aura and the respect that Gianni Agnelli and all Italy felt for
him, Fiat just threw money at Ferrari, faltering only in the depths of the 1973
recession and the oil crisis, when it actually withdrew from Formula One as its
business almost collapsed. In the Enzo Ferrari
years sports car production alternated between a thousand to a many thousands of
cars a year. After the near disaster of 1973, misfortune struck again in the
late eighties, when the Gulf War broke out and no one bought a Ferrari for three
months. Ferrari found itself with too many €80,000 sports cars in storage.
Without Fiat, then in control of 90 per cent of the shares, it would have gone
bust. It was in a management vacuum after Enzo Ferrari died. With things going
from bad to worse, in 1991 Gianni Agnelli drafted in his best trouble-shooter –
a man familiar to everyone – Luca di Montezemolo. His first act was to cut
production to get rid of unsold cars. He knew Ferrari could never be successful
selling cars from stock. He had to make Ferraris rare again. It worked so well
that production is now up to a fixed 4,000 cars a year. He also hiked the price
20 per cent and with better designs and engineering the price stuck. Di Montezemolo
swears that 4,000 is the highest number that will ever be built, whatever the
market conditions. “Even in five years’ time Ferrari will be producing the same
number of cars – it will never be more than 4,000,” he says. “I want to keep the
exclusivity, and the high value of the product. I want to control the new car
market.” That is somewhat easier to say in boom conditions – the difficulty will
come in the next recession. There are plenty of Ferrari buyers right now,
probably more than ever before in the history of the car. But whether Ferrari
could still eke out a profit on sales of 2,000 cars a year is another matter.
One thing is certain, however – when recession does strike again, di Montezemolo
has a plan to cope rather better than last time. The bottom line is
what he is really all about. He has always been a talented manager and the only
reason he has never succeeded in a bigger way is that he has always been
attracted to glamorous, riskier enterprises. Since he arrived in
1991 sales have more than doubled. In the last four years Ferrari has been the
world’s fastest growing car-maker, with sales rising from €379 million in 1995
to over €600 million last year. Di Montezemolo admits he has been surprised at
the level of growth: “Four years ago we were expecting half of what we have
now,” he says.
The renaissance has
been a mixture of everything. More cars sold, better marketing, better market
coverage, higher prices and more income from the race team. The race team is now
a very important part of the balance sheet. Its sponsorship income is getting on
for a fifth of the whole factory’s sales. Contrary to what others think Fiat no
longer pumps in millions – the team has become largely self-supporting, with
Fiat perhaps chipping in as little as US$15 million or so a year in sponsorship. Michael Schumacher’s
salary is five per cent of the total costs, hence di Montezemolo’s keenness for
him to return quickly from injury. Di Montezemolo thinks that within two years
the racing team will be contributing to Ferrari’s bottom line rather than being
a burden. It was his idea to set up Ferrari Idea SpA, the merchandise arm which
now has separate retail value sales of over €400 million a year. Ferrari’s road car
sales are incredibly buoyant. It now sells more cars in Britain than its
homeland, which speaks volumes. Last year it sold 818 cars in North America, 640
in Germany, 446 in Britain and just 380 in Italy. Italy is now only Ferrari’s
fourth largest market. Thanks to di Montezemolo it is now possible to buy and
have a Ferrari serviced on 90 per cent of the world’s land mass. Di Montezemolo’s
rise has always been subject to close scrutiny. He trained as a lawyer and until
1973 no one knew who he was. At 26, straight from Columbia University, he landed
a job as assistant to Enzo Ferrari. This was great training as Ferrari was beset
by the problems of the 1973
recession and the oil shortage. Di Montezemolo’s contribution and support to
Ferrari was well noted and three years later he was made managing director of
the Ferrari sporting division and promptly won three world constructors
championships and two drivers championships in the most sustained period of
success Ferrari has ever had. This established his
reputation and he promptly left Ferrari and spent five years in the curious
position of head of external relations for the whole Fiat Group. This appeared
to be a familiarisation process of the whole Agnelli empire, and a clear sign
that he was being considered as a future head of the family business. Di
Montezemolo shrugs off any discussion about succession at Fiat. He says it is
not even on the agenda and never has been: “They know that I am very busy with
Ferrari and that Ferrari and Maserati are two fantastic companies. To be honest,
when I first heard these rumours I was really
surprised because I haven’t worked inside Fiat for a long time. In the 25 years
I have worked, I have only spent seven of them at Fiat.” There are clear
indications that di Montezemolo was considered a member of the Agnelli family.
But why? There is no indication of him being that, although he has always been
treated as such. There is a Luca in a distant branch of the family but it is not
him. The only explanation is that he is a direct descendant of Fiat founder
Giovanni Agnelli born outside of the official family. Italian journalists
regularly refer to him as ‘a nephew’. But it is a question that remains
unanswered, even by insiders, as apparently no journalist has ever dared ask di
Montezemolo to his face, until EuroBusiness pitched the question. Surprised at
being asked directly he said: “It’s not true.” He says speculation rose during
his childhood as he became almost a member of the family but says: “One of my
three best friends is Agnelli’s nephew. I’ve known Agnelli since I was 15 years
old. Now I am 52, so I’ve been in touch with him for many, many years.” That may well be.
But the suspicion lingers and if there is any truth in it di Montezemolo is not
saying, aside from admitting that his relationship with Gianni Agnelli goes
beyond the normal boss/employee status. He admits they speak together on a daily
basis and Agnelli’s shadow is ever present at di Montezemolo’s shoulder. There
is still a chance that he will take over when Gianni Agnelli passes on. “I speak with him
every day. We don’t necessarily talk about Ferrari, but I am in touch with him a
lot. I even talk a lot with the managing director of Fiat, Paolo Cantarella,
over the future of Ferrari – because Ferrari is very important for Fiat.” For certain di
Montezemolo worships the ground that Gianni Agnelli walks on, as he admits: “In
my life I have had two people that have taught me a lot: Enzo Ferrari and Gianni
Agnelli. Agnelli likes Ferrari very much, he is proud of it. He’s always very
close to me and to Ferrari.” So much so that,
apart from a five-year secondment to organise Italy’s 1990 world cup, di
Montezemolo has spent 26 years as a senior executive at Agnelli-owned companies.
After five years at Fiat he was appointed managing director of ITDEDI SpA, the
Agnelli-owned publishing company that produces titles including the Turin daily
newspaper La Stampa. In 1984 he had a short stint as managing director of
Cinzano, the drinks firm and another Agnelli offshoot, during which he organised
Italy’s assault on the America’s Cup. He then moved on to spend five years
organising Italy’s hosting of the 1990 world cup. After which he spent a couple
of years as managing director of RCS Video, part of the Rizzoli Group, before
moving to Ferrari a few years after Enzo Ferrari’s death. Being president of
Ferrari is one of the best jobs in the world when times are good but it is a
lousy job in recession. And di Montezemolo has experienced both. His first few
months were spent keeping Ferrari alive. It was made easier because of Fiat’s
almost unconditional financial support. It has total independence by virtue of
Gianni Agnelli’s promises to Enzo Ferrari and also the fact that Enzo’s son
Piero owns 10 per cent of the company. Di Montezemolo says: “Unlike Alfa Romeo
or Lancia, Ferrari is very independent, although Fiat does have a financial
contribution. We do our cars completely differently. Our clients are different.
We are present all over the world, including Japan. Our largest market is the
United States, where Fiat doesn’t sell a single car. When you talk of Ferrari
and Fiat, you have to consider that Ferrari is like La Stampa. The paper is
owned by Fiat, but it is an independent newspaper. The same goes for Ferrari.”
Once di Montezemolo
had the Ferrari revival firmly under control, he then turned his attention to
the racing team and hired a completely new team centred around ace driver
Michael Schumacher. He tore the rule book up when he agreed to pay Schumacher an
initial US$20 million a season in mid-1995. It was as much as the rest of the
grid of drivers then earned between them. With the race team
sorted out, he turned to a new challenge – the Fiat-owned struggling sports car
maker Maserati. Ferrari initially bought 50 per cent of Maserati from Fiat and
the remaining 50 per cent in December 1999. On first inspection,
di Montezemolo found a ramshackle factory and a company in its death throes. But
he realised that Maserati could be strategically very important for Ferrari. The
self-imposed Ferrari production limit of 4,000 cars left
room for another sports car brand – a car that cost less than a Ferrari. “After
five years it was very important for us to have in our dealer networks a car
that was very sporty, Italian, less expensive than Ferrari and of course without
any kind of overlapping,” says di Montezemolo. “It had to be different. Maserati
is perfect – it is a huge Italian name and has a long history of winning
important Formula One races with Stirling Moss and Juan Manuel Fangio. It is a
sports car and it is Italian, so it is prestigious.” Di Montezemolo believes
Maserati fits better under the Ferrari umbrella than Fiat’s: “The typology of
the Maserati cars is very different from Fiat, but it is closer to Ferrari.
Furthermore, since the beginning Maserati has been based in Modena. Therefore
there was a good opportunity to create a synergy with Ferrari.” But getting Maserati
was a doubled-edged sword. It needed a huge amount of investment. Di Montezemolo
shut down production for at least a year in late 1997 and completely gutted and
rebuilt the factory at a cost of US$40 million. He says: “We have invested huge
amounts of money to rebuild, or rather create, a very modern, up-to-date, high
technology factory.” In hindsight it was a huge gamble, as it wasn’t only the
factory that had to be rebuilt – the styling, engineering, management and market
had to have a make-over as well. The only thing di Montezemolo found that was
good about Maserati was its name, as he says: “We completely reorganised the
company and people, the method of work and mentality.” But that was only stage
one. Stage two is just beginning, as he says: “Now we have started to create and
reorganise the dealers’ network all over the world and have introduced a brand
new model – the Maserati Coupe.” Di Montezemolo’s intention is to bring Maserati
production up to 10,000 cars a year and presumably bring the price down. He is
taking things gradually, step-by-step. Ten thousand is on target by 2005, when
clearly the model range will be very different from the one of today. The
current Maserati models resemble top of the range Toyotas but di Montezemolo
aims to bring it on a level with Porsche, Jaguar, BMW and Mercedes sports cars
at a price level of around €80,000. To achieve that he
is introducing new models such as the eagerly-awaited Spider, as he says: “We
are producing 2,000 Maseratis at the moment but our objective is to achieve
5,000. Aside from the Spider we are working with Pininfarina on a new four-door
car. In five years’ time we hope to reach 10,000 by going back to the United
States.” It is clear that
styling is the future of Maserati and that, currently, it leaves a little to be
desired, hence Pininfarina’s involvement. Di Montezemolo agrees: “Maserati has
to be a car with key characteristics. Firstly, very advanced technology. Second,
a mix between Italian desire, flavour and sport – a car that you can immediately
feel is Italian. And third, a car with great performance but one that you can
use every day in every condition and with enough room inside.” During its recent
years of neglect Maserati has suffered from a tarnished image and di Montezemolo
plans to revamp that image. He intends to spend 10 per cent of sales on
advertising in a massive re-branding exercise that may cost up to €45 million
this year. He is not about to spend €40 million on the car and then fail to tell
anyone about it. But he also says that the rumours surrounding him possibly
buying the small Swiss F1 team Sauber and renaming it Maserati are also just
speculation. He admits it would make sense for Ferrari to reintroduce Maserati
to the sport but baulks at the prospect. He says he could never consider
launching a team with the Maserati brand but using a Ferrari engine. He says he
would have to start from scratch, and that would defeat the object: “Maserati is
a car manufacturer. Therefore if it is to race in F1 it has to build its own
engine,” he says. “It’s not like Sauber or Prost, which are not car
manufacturers – they are just assembly teams – they don’t sell cars. Maserati is
a very important car manufacturer, so if it is going to race in F1 it has to
build the car, the engine, everything.” But still di
Montezemolo’s brand and marketing ambitions for Maserati are huge and limitless.
He intends to make it synonymous with state-of-the-art technology. He also sees
great potential for Maserati merchandise. And he is installing a programme
dedicated to customer service called Maserati’s upper market services, which
will provide insurance, finance and peace of mind motoring. Di Montezemolo also
wants to sell Maseratis on the Internet: “We intend to sell Maserati worldwide
through the Internet,” he says. The marketing costs will delay Maserati’s return
to profitability for at least three years and depress Ferrari’s bottom line: “I
hope in three years from now to break even.” The big danger is of
course taking sales from Ferrari. Whilst di Montezemolo may be clear about the
differentials, certainly customers are not. To them there is no essential
difference between the brands. Both are exotic Italian sports cars. It is di
Montezemolo’s job to get customers to think differently. He says: “The customer
in my opinion is related to the product. The Ferrari client is looking for
exclusivity, super high price and extreme performance, whereas a Maserati client
is looking for similar things but to lesser degrees – an important car, but less
exclusivity; a high price, but not too extreme; sports performance, but again
not too extreme. The Maserati client also wants a car with four doors,
two-plus-two seats and therefore more room inside. In short, Ferrari is extreme
in everything, the ultimate drive, unlike Maserati, which is a high level car,
but not as extreme.” Di Montezemolo
attempts to explain what is going to be a difficult marketing message to get
across: “Ferrari is like a very pretty woman that you desperately desire but is
sometimes difficult to go out for dinner with. Maserati is a very good looking
woman, less extreme in other words, less difficult to go out for dinner with but
still a high level woman.” One can hardly
imagine Mercedes-Benz’s Jurgen Hubbert or BMW’s Joachim Millberg using the same
terms to describe a car. But that is where di Montezemolo has the advantage – as
well as being president he is also a typical Ferrari and
Maserati customer – he knows how they feel, whereas Hubbert and Millberg are
traditional executives running car companies. For di Montezemolo
Ferrari’s uniqueness stems from its inseparability from Formula One. Ever since
the days of F1 driver-founder Enzo Ferrari there has been the link, and although
there have been hiccups in its history, F1 is inextricably bound up in Ferrari’s
business. It represents nearly a third of the business in cost terms and a
quarter in turnover. Di Montezemolo says it is also an essential element of the
Ferrari road car’s development. In his own words he sums it up: “Ferrari is a
mixture of passion, high technology, and sport. We have been for 50 years the
only one to develop and build a Formula One car. A lot of car manufacturers
supply engines or gearboxes, but not the entire car.” By making a complete car,
Ferrari has the unique opportunity to develop technologies that directly fit on
road cars. For example, it was the first car manufacturer to introduce a Formula
One-style gearbox on a road car – an innovation most others are following. Di
Montezemolo says: “We have transferred our F1 experience to our road cars. So
for us F1 is not just a question of image – it is also an opportunity to
transfer technology. The big success of our road cars is because we have such
advances in aerodynamics, in the engine, in the gearbox.” Di Montezemolo says
Formula One is now giving Ferrari a very good return on its investment rather
than being a black hole for Fiat’s cash. He also goes so far as to insist that
F1 is now actually contributing to the Ferrari bottom line rather than being a
drain: “What we invest in Formula One gives us a good return on investment,” he
says. He is referring
mostly to the Ferrari brand. The brand on its own already brings US$13 million
to Ferrari’s bottom line just from licencing fees. The reason is clear – Ferrari
evokes values beyond the name of a car. There are few worldwide brands that come
anywhere close to Ferrari’s values of exclusivity, passion, chic and fast
living. Yet strangely the brand is under-utilised and di Montezemolo thinks 10
times that income is possible in the next five years. Ferrari Idea was literally
his idea and he thinks it will ultimately be more profitable than car-making. Ferrari Idea SpA
will prosper through the sale of merchandise. Di Montezemolo has thought out a
careful marketing plan for the merchandise recognising the blue collar and white
collar appeal of Ferrari that few would even comprehend: “We do merchandising
for two very different targets,” he says. “One is the popular target; the other
the high-level target.” And that is his genius. For all the high aristocratic
aura he commands, di Montezemolo is not above strolling around the spectator
enclosures and observing some of his Ferrari (merchandise) customers first hand.
He is a brave man, as some of the sights are not pretty. But he understands he
has to have a marketing strategy for them as well. However, the fact
remains that Ferrari’s star employee’s merchandise sales are much higher than
its own. It is clearly a sore point and di Montezemolo bristles visibly. He is
horrified at the comparison. He is said to regret the deal Ferrari signed with
Schumacher allowing him to use the Ferrari brand on his own merchandise. He says Willy
Weber’s (Schumacher’s manager) selling techniques are completely different to
his own. Weber is looking at the short-term, quick gain. Di Montezemolo is
thinking long-term, because he does not want to dilute the brand. He says: “We
are not pushing on the merchandising to do everything, Ferrari is far more
exclusive. A driver can sell everything because his career is not for so long,
so he has to take the opportunity at the right moment to sell everything. We
have a very exclusive catalogue with not so many products. It’s a different
target and a different mentality of people.” It is fair to say
that when the contract was signed with Schumacher more than five years ago, the
value of the Ferrari brand had not been realised and it is not di Montezemolo’s
fault that the value has now rocketed. To maintain
exclusivity he limits the licences carefully: “We choose big worldwide partners,
but we don’t give out many licences. We have super control over how someone else
can use the Ferrari mark. For me that is the most important part of the company,
so we place a strong emphasis on protecting it.” There is much more
to come. Already di Montezemolo has turned the Ferrari factory near Bologna into
something akin to a theme park. As well as a state-of-the-art road and race-car
facility, it has external attractions such as a museum. Rumours of an actual
Ferrari theme park abound. What is coming for certain is a chain of merchandise
shops that is being planned for three years hence. Di Montezemolo is planning up
to 40 shops selling Ferrari merchandise, and there are also e-commerce deals in
the pipeline. “We want to increase our sales routes by opening some upper-market
shops, using Internet e-commerce to increase our merchandising sales, and
creating new video games.” As for the main
product – cars – it could not be rosier, as di Montezemolo says: “Last year we
beat our historic record of sales in the US – we have never sold so many cars,
it’s been a fantastic year. We have also won the championship for constructors.
I learnt one very important lesson from Enzo Ferrari: to look ahead. I am sure
that he is very happy to see a car company looking as far ahead as we do. That
is the reason for our success right now.”
Author: Catherine Monk |